Add new comment

Let's remember that "student engagement and opportunities to learn are the right of all students" also includes ALL students who are gifted and talented, advanced learners, whatever today's buzzword classification is. While the majority of measures like the several times-proposed proposed TALENT Act and research by the often unfunded or underfunded Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program are focused on serving students traditionally underrepresented, as long as there is not a national mandate for services or funding for serving ALL gifted/talented similar to IDEA for disabilities, the access or implementation for programs of acceleration (not enrichment) for advanced learners is predominately dependent on economics- whether you can afford to live in a high real estate value community or not. In most LEAs even White/Caucasian students, male or female, have zero or limited "enrichment" opportunities (let alone acceleration) and spend all their school days waiting for the other students to "catch up" and enduring multiple cycles of repetition, kill and drill or long-mastered skills. "Guided Reading" limited to a maximum reading level for that grade, and no implementation of "pre-testing" and options for compacting curriculum when a mastery of 85% or even as much as 100% is already shown, is a waste of students ability, not to mention educational financial resources.